Modern Family Analysis free essay sample

Manny Manny is Gloria’s 13 year old son from her first marriage. He is very outgoing and not the least bit self-conscious. He is also very mature and intuitive for his age and is often shown doing adult like things such as having conversations about marriage and kids and drinking coffee. Jay Jay is the father of Claire and Mitchell, husband of Gloria, grandfather of Lily, Like, Alex, and Haley, and the stepfather of Manny. He is an owner of a construction firm and is wealthy. Cameron Tucker Cameron, also referred to as Cam, is Mitchell’s partner of five years, and one of Lily’s fathers, who has a very big and dramatic personality. His outgoing personality contrasts to Mitchell’s uptight manner, which causes them to have opposing character traits. Mitchell Pritchett Mitchell is Jay’s son, Claire’s younger brother, Luke, Alex and Haley’s uncle, one of Lily’s fathers and partner of five years to Cameron. We will write a custom essay sample on Modern Family Analysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He is a low key and mild manner person. Claire Dunphy Claire is the daughter of Jay, Mitchell’s older sister, and the overprotective mother of the Dunphy family and their three very different children. Phil Dunphy Phil is Claire’s husband of 18 years who views himself as the â€Å"cool dad. † He constantly tries to find ways to bond with his three kids and is seen as eing juvenile attitude and is often referred to by Claire as â€Å"the kid† she is married to. Haley Dunphy Haley is the daughter of Claire and Phil who is portrayed as a stereotypical teenager. Haley is depicted as being a bit of a bimbo, who focuses more on social status than her studies. Alex Dunphy Alex is the daughter of Claire and Phil who is also the most clever and intellectual of their three children. She is the middle of the three children and enjoys messing with both her older sister and younger brother equally who are not quite as intelligent as she is and are easy to fool. Luke D unphy Luke is the youngest son of Phil and Claire. He is rambunctious and is often doing his own thing. He can be a trouble maker but he is very innocent and does not always understand the repercussions of his actions. Episodes: Episode 60 Send out the Clowns In this episode Cameron’s clown mentor dies and he must attend his funeral where he meets up with his former clown partner Lewis. The two were huge hits with kid’s parties until Cameron disbanded the team. Lewis is still unhappy with Cameron for disbanding the team. When Phil scores the biggest listing of his life things get heated between him and Mitzi Roth who tries to steal clients from good natured realtors. In an effort to expose Mitzi for what she truly is, Phil borrows Luke’s spy pen and records a conversation of Mitzi confessing to all of her dirty underhanded ways after which she gives him a friendly hug where she tries to swipe the pen from him. Later, Luke runs into Mitzi at the supermarket where he tells her how worried his dad is about money. All part of a purely genius plan to play on her deeply buried sensitive side to get her to give Phil the dream listing back. Griffin who is one of the cool kids in school comes over to hang with Manny. Griffin is only interested in Gloria and has a little crush on her. He invites everyone over to his place for a pool party. Manny discovers this when he overhears Jay and Gloria chatting, but it’s okay because Manny is only using Griffin to get close to the kid’s cute sister, so now he doesn’t feel as bad about it. Episode 65 Leap Day In this episode the Dunphy family plans on spending leap day flying high on a trapeze. But a full day of family fun is threatened when the guys realize that Claire, Haley and Alex are all having that time of the month. The guys conspire to ditch the girls so they can trapeze in peace, when the plan backfires Manny decides to head home but Phil has other plans. He wants Luke to pour fake blood on his finger so they can make a fake trip to the doctor’s office. At a sports bar Gloria gets into a shouting match where Jay must step in to calm the two down. Later, Jay gets the feeling that Gloria wanted him to fight the other guy for her but Gloria then realizes how lucky she is to be married to a calm man. Cameron is 10 years old this year, having been born on leap day. Mitchell decides to put together a Wizard of Oz party his husband in celebration of his birthday. He plans to have all of the characters at the party until he remembers that a twister recently devastated Cameron’s family. Cameron discovers that Mitchell threw this party together last minute when the captain of the boat informs them that there is not enough room to accommodate the entire party. To prove that he is still a tough guy Jay wants to fight the boat captain, Cameron is trying to overcome major leap day disappointment and Phil would rather take the place of a dead whale instead of dealing with highly emotional girls. Episode 66 Egg Drop In this episode of Modern Family Luke and Manny must design something that can protect an egg from a drop from one story. Later, Claire and Jay learn what Luke and Manny did, tricking them into doing their projects for them where it leads to a heart to heart where Jay reveals that he is proud of Claire for never giving up. Mitchell and Cameron are on the lookout for their next birthmother. When Mitchell leaves to prepare some sparkling cider, Cameron decides to perform another song to prove that he is not pitchy. The song he picks is â€Å"If you Leave me Now†, which makes Lindsay emotional and decides to keep her baby. Cameron things that it is his voice that cost them the child, but Mitchell is positive that it was the Baby, please don’t go lyric that convinced her o keep the baby. Phil starts at his new real estate agency and wants to start out by giving a stellar seminar for first-time homebuyers where he will talk about the five keys to investing wisely. Gloria will be in the audience prepared to ask a question that will lead him to his sixth key and then have Haley fire a confetti ca nnon. Gloria and Haley decide to use some down time to go to the beauty salon where their car gets towed and results in Phil doing the entire presentation solo. Gloria wants Phil to yell at her because she believes that you know you are loved when your family feels free to scream at you. Analysis: In â€Å"Modern Family† the main relationship type that occurs is family, which is a â€Å"relationship characterized by defined roles, recognition of mutual responsibilities, a shared history and future, and shared living space† (DeVito, 2011, p. 91). The majority of the main characters in the sitcom are either related to one another or very close friends. The next main relationship type that occurs in the sitcom is friendship which â€Å"is an interpersonal relationship between two people that is mutually productive and characterized by mutual positive regard† (DeVito, 2011, p. 4). The majority of the friendships are reciprocal in nature which is defined as â€Å"the ideal type, characterized by loyalty, self-sacrifice, mutual affection and generosity† (DeVito, 2011, p. 85). Friendship is an obvious part of the sitcom because of the way that Phil tries to interact with his kids trying to be the cool dad and in some situations such as Manny and Luke’s friendship where they tend to be using each other for a benefit which can be defined as a receptive which is â€Å"an imbalance in giving and receiving† (DeVito, 2011, p. 5). With every friendship and family type relationships there is also interpersonal conflict. Interpersonal conflict can be defined as â€Å"an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent people who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, or interference in the achievement of their goals† (Beebe, Bebee, Redmond, 2011, p. 130). When Phil and Mitzi go through their struggle over the â€Å"listing of a lifetime† is one example of how this type of interpersonal conflict is included in the sitcom. Throughout the sitcom there is also a strong presence of the relationships rules theory which is â€Å"the general assumption of rules theory is that relationships – friendship and love, in particular – are held together by adherence to certain rules† (DeVito, 2011, p. 102). The different relationships that occur throughout the episodes show that if the unspoken rules of the different relationships are broken that â€Å"the relationship may deteriorate and even dissolve† (DeVito, 2011, p. 02). One example would be the unspoken rules between the relationship of Cam and Mitchell. Their relationship can be defined as a domestic partnership because they are not a traditional family which is defined as â€Å"a family of a husband, a wife, and one or more children (DeVito, 2011, p. 92). They have been together for five years and have followed the rules throughout the five years in order to live together peacefully in a fulfilling relationship with each other.

Human Rights Nonprofit Advocacy Organisations In Uk Social Work Essay Essays

Human Rights Nonprofit Advocacy Organisations In Uk Social Work Essay Essays Human Rights Nonprofit Advocacy Organisations In Uk Social Work Essay Essay Human Rights Nonprofit Advocacy Organisations In Uk Social Work Essay Essay The constitution of public policy requires strong protagonism administrations as they are boosters and Godheads of policy thoughts, suppliers of indispensable resources ( expertness, financess and information ) and makers of public sentiment needed to accomplish effectual policies. There is an ample diverseness within the population of protagonism group, some are good set up advocators with memorable histories of policy work while others are freshly emerged administrations recommending for a cause. Working on a assortment of subjects, they operate at all degrees in the policy sphere. They have many organisational signifiers, support beginnings, and protections. Their activities cover a broad scope of tactics that include lobbying, forming, research, run finance, and so forth ( McNutt, 2010 ) . Nowadays it s non an easy undertaking to measure who and how many administrations engage in protagonism activities. Measuring lobbying outgo is non plenty as lobbying is merely one among assorted activities included in protagonism pattern. Advocacy includes a huge scope of undertakings such as researching, letter-writing, analysing, educating, skill-building, constructing relationships, mobilizing, forming, protesting, petitioning, facilitating, rousing power, convention, etc ( Avner, 2004 ) . There are plentifulness of chances for administrations to progress a policy and societal alteration without even prosecuting in lobbying. Advocacy is an indispensable activity for non-profit-making administrations in United Kingdom. In its assorted signifiers, whether implies buttonholing or instruction and agenda-setting, protagonism plays an of import function in the non-profit-making sector. Therefore understanding what non-profit-making protagonism is, how and to what extent protagonism is practiced and what are the nucleus organizational features with an impact on protagonism engagement is of a important affair. Most non-profit-making protagonism is carried by administrations with a nucleus mission of protagonism but direct service administrations gained recently a significant function in the protagonism sphere. An of import issue is that this type of administrations face particular challenges when practising advocacy non as a primarly but as a secondary organisational map to back up the nucleus mission of direct service. ( Kimberlin, 2010 ) Assorted philosophical and practical barriers are faced by direct services non-profit-making administrations when they try to implement effectual protagonism activities. The chief philosophical barrier is related to the unwilligness to to the full authorise components as advocators expressed by some service oriented not-for-profits. In this instance components are regarded more as service receivers instead so active organisation representatives. Althought there is a clear tendency in public policy doing to back up the demand for non-profit-making direct service administrations to leverage the cognition and expertness of their components and staff to recommend for societal justness ( Donaldson, 2008 ) . Practical barriers can be deficiency of support, fright of requital from nucleus organisational funders or limited protagonism accomplishments among staff. Literature reappraisal There are many ways to specify non-profit-making protagonism. Even if many non-profit-making administrations advocate on behalf of single clients, more frequently non-profit-making protagonism refers to collective protagonism. A frequent definition of non-profit-making protagonism is produced by Jenkins who describe protagonism as any effort tp influence the determinations of an institutional elite on behalf of a corporate involvement. ( Jenkins, 1987:297 ) . Scholars have advanced definitions that emphasize the struggle inherent in protagonism, for them advocacy organisations do public involvement claims either advancing or defying societal alteration that, if implemented, would conflict with the societal, cultural, political, or economic involvements or values of other constituencies and groups. ( Andrews and Edwards, 2004:481 ) Assorted researchings differentiate between self involvement organisational protagonism and progressive protagonism. If self involvement protagonism is designed to protect administration support contracts, progressive protagonism pattern refers to advocacy that ( 1 ) seeks to reference underlying structural and power unfairnesss as distinct from protagonism motivated by organisational involvement, and ( 2 ) applies strategies that meaningfully prosecute clients or components in all facets of the protagonism procedure. ( Donaldson, 2008:26 ) In this instance protagonism s primarly intent is to progress the involvements of components, instead so self involvements. Furthermore components are engaged in the protagonism sphere. Another position in specifying non-profit-making protagonism is the scope of administrations categorized as not-for-profit. In a research about protagonism administrations engaged in the political procedure, Andrews and Edwards ( 2004 ) include involvement groups, societal motion administrations and direct service not-for-profit bureaus. Some protagonism research workers ( Reid, 2006 ) analyzed administrations for whom protagonism is a nucleus mission. Others ( Donaldson, 2008 ) have explored direct service administrations that consider protagonism as a secondary organizational activity. Few researches focus on protagonism across both types of non-profit-making administrations ( Salmon, 2002 ) . Research purpose The intent of this thesis is to analyze the patterns of service orientated non-profit-making administrations in the specific field of human rights ( LGBT sector ) . The purpose of this survey is to place organisational features associated with engagement in protagonism, practical schemes and best patterns for easing protagonism attempts in organisations that conduct protagonism as a secondary instead than core organisational activity in the human rights field ( LGBT sector ) . Footings of mention To what extent non-profit-making organisations triping in human rights field ( LGBT sector ) participate in the protagonism sphere? There is any relationship between reception of authorities support and engagement in protagonism? Can assorted non-profit-making features, like organisational size and adulthood, have an influence on protagonism apetite? Can serve oriented non-profit-making administrations employ the same schemes used by nucleus protagonism not-for-profits? What are the restrictions? What are the most effectual patterns and schemes for non-profit-making administrations triping in human rights field ( LGBT sector ) to accomplish protagonism ends? Another unsolved inquiry in the literature that examines not-for-profit protagonism is the extent to which bureau protagonism behaviour is motivated by self or agency-interest, for illustration, to protect support beginnings, or make bureaus have a broader intent to their protagonism agenda that includes turn toing structural and power unfairnesss. the reply to these inquiries might act upon the schemes and tactics bureaus use in their protagonism pattern, that is, whether or non the bureau engages in progressive protagonism, or protagonism that is largely expert-driven and motivated chiefly by agency-interest. Advocacy is stating or showing something you know to person you know in order to better the quality of life for others ( Mitchell and Philibert 2002 ; Zeitler 2007 ) In order to be most effectual, protagonism attempts require a echt desire for alteration and efi ¬?cient communicating. Advocacy besides involves constructing relationships with fellow advocators, every bit good as elected ofi ¬?cials at the local, province, and national degrees ( LaRocco and Bruns 2005 ; Zeitler 2007 ) . Andrews, K. A ; Edwards, B. ( 2004 ) . Advocacy organisations in the U.S. political procedure. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 479-506. hypertext transfer protocol: //web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.leedsmet.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=10HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol: //web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.leedsmet.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=10 A ; hid=113 A ; sid=e8d04f04-1eaf-4dc2-808a-2754c2071dd5 @ sessionmgr112 amp ; HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol: //web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.leedsmet.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=10 A ; hid=113 A ; sid=e8d04f04-1eaf-4dc2-808a-2754c2071dd5 @ sessionmgr112 hid=113HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol: //web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.leedsmet.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=10 A ; hid=113 A ; sid=e8d04f04-1eaf-4dc2-808a-2754c2071dd5 @ sessionmgr112 amp ; HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol: //web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.leedsmet.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=10 A ; hid=113 A ; sid=e8d04f04-1eaf-4dc2-808a-2754c2071dd5 @ sessionmgr112 sid=e8d04f04-1eaf-4dc2-808a-2754c2071dd5 % 40sessionmgr112 Avner, M. ( 2004 ) . The lobbying and protagonism enchiridion for non-profit-making organisations: Determining public policy at the province and local degree. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation. Donaldson, L. ( 2008 ) . Developing a progressive protagonism plan within a human services bureau. Administration in Social Work, 32 ( 2 ) , 25-47. Jenkins, J. C. ( 1987 ) . Nonprofit organisations and policy protagonism. In W. Powell ( Ed. ) , The non-profit-making sector: A research enchiridion ( pp. 296-320 ) . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Kimberlin, Sara E. ( 2010 ) Advocacy by Nonprofit organizations: Functions and Practices of Core Advocacy Organizations and Direct Service Agencies , Journal of Policy Practice, 9: 3, 164 182 hypertext transfer protocol: //dx.doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2010.487249 LaRocco, D. J. , A ; Bruns, D. A. ( 2005 ) . Advocacy is merely a phone call off: Schemes to do a difference on behalf of kids and their households. Young Exceptional Children, 8 ( 4 ) , 11-18. McNutt, John G. ( 2010 ) Researching Advocacy Groups: Internet Sources for Research about Public Interest Groups and Social Movement Organizations , Journal of Policy Practice, 9: 3, 308 312 hypertext transfer protocol: //dx.doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2010.487247 Mitchell, L. M. , A ; Philibert, D. B. ( 2002 ) . Family, professional, and political protagonism: Rights and duties. Young Exceptional Children, 5 ( 4 ) , 11-18. Reid, E. ( 2006 ) . Nonprofit protagonism and political engagement. In E. T. Boris A ; C. E. Steuerle ( Eds. ) , Nonprofits and authorities: Collaboration and struggle ( pp.343-371 ) . Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.campuskitchens.org/kellogg/images/ves/nonprofit_advocacy_and_participation.pdf Salamon, L. ( 2002 ) . Explaining non-profit-making protagonism: An explorative analysis. Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies, Center for Civil Society Studies Working Paper No. 21. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cedag-eu.org/uploads/File/workingpaper21.pdf

Shakesepeare English Lit Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Shakesepeare English Lit - Essay Example Killings, blood, lust and madness is all that surrounds him and yet we are constrained to feel for him. Macbeth surely establishes himself as the darkest character and the blackest villain of literature. Macbeth is the classic flawed Alpha male. Directed by Roman Polanski, the 140 minutes of this version is exciting and fresh. Polanski’s Macbeth is the same account as William Shakespeare’s immortal play about a Scottish warrior whose wife’s desire for power transforms him into a brute and results in his final downfall. Polanski’s Macbeth is imbued with miserable locales and nudity which is generally not a trait of Shakespeare’s plays along with realistically violent murders and brutal blood shedding by the sensational Macbeth. He is intriguingly complex and ambitious. Since the beginning we hear of his great exploits on the battlefield. Finch gives a realistic performance of a one time good man turning into an unreasonable immoral madman. Polanski creates an impressive, harsh landscape. The castle looks as stark as one might imagine. ‘Blood will have blood’ he has taken quite literally. The tragedy with Macbeth is that he is impatient to wait and let things take their course. The hand behind the misery his life is that of his wife, Lady Macbeth. She is aware of her husband’s interior motives and madness and that his husband wants to attain the title of the king. She knows that he will go to any lengths of evilness to attain it. She continuously verbally assaults him about his manhood and in lieu drives away all the kindness from him. Francisca Annis, who has portrayed Lady Macbeth in this film, looks more simpering than sinister. Modernization of Shakespeare has always been a tricky affair. About 50 years ago the audience had greeted Joe Macbeth, the violent and gangster version of Macbeth, by the British director Ken Hughes. Two years back Geoffery Wright gave us his version of Macbeth which is an Australian film. He has dared to take the